<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Archipelago</title>
	<atom:link href="http://armenotype.com/2012/04/archipelago/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://armenotype.com/2012/04/archipelago/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 02:11:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1instructional</title>
		<link>http://armenotype.com/2012/04/archipelago/?lang=hy#comment-165461</link>
		<dc:creator>1instructional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 23:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armenotype.com/?p=994#comment-165461</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;1footstool...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1footstool…</strong></p>
<p>…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Savard</title>
		<link>http://armenotype.com/2012/04/archipelago/?lang=hy#comment-2386</link>
		<dc:creator>John Savard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armenotype.com/?p=994#comment-2386</guid>
		<description>I am assuming that the example of a &quot;heavy Latinized&quot; Armenian typeface as shown is being treated as something open to question. But in that case, people are going to wonder why a close historical revival of Bologir should also be classed as something one might do before one &quot;knew any better&quot;.

I think that the course being recommended is neither a slavish following of the most popular foreign model, or remaining bound to traditional historical forms - but instead drawing on historical forms creatively, and being open to a wider range of foreign influences.

But this wasn&#039;t mentioned, and this alternative won&#039;t immediately occur to many readers without a typographical or other artistic background. Instead, they may just see rejection of the two most obvious choices, and end up being baffled as to which side you&#039;re on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am assuming that the example of a «heavy Latinized» Armenian typeface as shown is being treated as something open to question. But in that case, people are going to wonder why a close historical revival of Bologir should also be classed as something one might do before one «knew any better».</p>
<p>I think that the course being recommended is neither a slavish following of the most popular foreign model, or remaining bound to traditional historical forms — but instead drawing on historical forms creatively, and being open to a wider range of foreign influences.</p>
<p>But this wasn’t mentioned, and this alternative won’t immediately occur to many readers without a typographical or other artistic background. Instead, they may just see rejection of the two most obvious choices, and end up being baffled as to which side you’re on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
